points: 2

A New Super Hero Is Born!

Bichaus unveils his new super identity "Cock Whore". Once again his super retard powers fucked up on the spelling front.

featured

by cheekycov

submitted October 23rd 2007

63 comments
what do you think? let everyone know!
A New Super Hero Is Born!
tagged:
votes:
muchoworthyBarret
pooch
not muchoworthy
comments (63)
Cheezy Harrold
10 years ago
Cum Handler
10 years ago
Cheekycov Humper
10 years ago
Cream Hungry
10 years ago
Cracker Hammerer
10 years ago
Custard Hag
10 years ago
Chicken Hugger
10 years ago
Choco Ho!
10 years ago
RyogaVee





...what? You were thinking it too.
10 years ago
actually, i was thinking put a "z" in front and "k" after.

that's right, "zchk."
10 years ago
Chocolate Hammer
10 years ago
i was thinking it too, smerf.
10 years ago
Crack Head?
10 years ago
Charming Hank
10 years ago
CUNT HAMMER!
10 years ago
Captain Hummer. I can't believe no one else thought of that.
10 years ago
GO SOX!
10 years ago
there are people in my race (like CH guy) that i hate
10 years ago
There is only one race.
10 years ago
SPAR-ok....i have to stop that
10 years ago
yes you do, and hank is right.
10 years ago
No he isn't.
10 years ago
Hank's wrong.

You can have more than one race for any particular species.

If there was only one race, there would be no need for the word 'race'.
10 years ago
unless he means the human race
10 years ago
there is only one human race, that's a fact.
10 years ago
"Humans often categorize themselves in terms of race or ethnicity, although the validity of human races as true biological categories is questionable." ok maybe not a fact :S
10 years ago
^pwn3d!
10 years ago
Besides humans, subspecies is generally used instead of race.

Even if you were to apply the term subspecies instead of race to humans, how would you seperate humans into distinct groups like that? By what criteria would you seperate them? Some set of physical characteristics, some set of genes? Can you specify groups so that each person will fall into one and only one group? How many subspecies would that entail, I wonder? Good luck. I think there will be as many "races" as there are humans on the planet. Yeaah, I'm Race No. 4,563,987. Woo hoo.

Race is much more of a social construct, a way to tell US from THEM, than any kind of biological reality. I think it's an idea that has outlived it's usefulness. Maybe we should create new racial groups based on behaviour? We could have the 'Thief Race', the 'Wife Beater Race', the 'Brown Noser Race', the 'WoW Addict Race', etc.. Of course, it still wouldn't be biologically sound, but more useful perhaps.

And Wanko, why don't you just start with trying to define 'race' in terms of humans? Your "edgy, thinking outside of the box, challenging the status quo, common sense approach" to race seems pretty insubstantial to me.
10 years ago
If there were no zombies, there would be no need for the word 'zombie'.

Hahahahahahahaha.
10 years ago
race is what we call it, wanko, but it's not a biologically correct word.
10 years ago
so again, hank is right.
10 years ago
You apply race or subspecies to humans just like to anything else. By your logic, we can't apply those terms to animals either. Probably we shouldn't even name colors because there are so many possible. And how are you gonna classify them? It's an idea that is no longer useful.

See Hank, now there's no green anymore. Or blue or brown. Look what you fucking did. It's just a social construct to separate the grass from the water from the dogshit. The crayon industry is going to be ruined.

And you know, I'm not into this whole thing, were we classify motor vehicles as Vans or hatchbacks or SUVs. It has no meaningful purpose. And there's some vehicles out there that are kinda like a station wagon and an SUV. Clearly all types of vehicles are the same. In fact, there are no different types of vehicles, that's only in your head. They're all human vehicles. And they don't come in differnt colors either, they just come 'painted'.
10 years ago
You fucking loser.

You completely ignored every question I put forth and just talked shit. As in, "since poop and shit are the same, everything in the world is the same." You fucking tool. You can't win this one. Answer my fucking questions.
10 years ago
Gotta love playing devil's advocate: Hank, do we not divide biological subspecies for animals based on physical characteristics? That's what nearly all subspecies are based on, so wouldn't race use the same method? The way I learned it, there are 3 biologically accepted races: Negaroid, Caucazoid, and Mongoloid, but I've never really believed too many things I've learned.
10 years ago
You are such a silly idiot. Nice try at obfuscation, since you can't support your points with any serious debate.

I did ask by what criteria you would seperate humans, can you seperate them into groups that would include them in one and only one group (like the groups of sub-species, for fucks sake, why do I have to re-ask this shit? Answer the first time, goddamnit!) and try to define race as it pertains to humans.

If you had tried to do any of these things, I might take you seriously.

Actually Wanko. You are starting to sound a little dumber recently. Maybe, you should take alittle break.
10 years ago
But I'm not Wanko...
10 years ago
You can't do that kind of clean division with anything that's sorted into subspecies or race, hank. There's always going to be overlap and fuzzy lines. Try to do it with dogs and you still have mutts to deal with. That doesn't mean that there aren't different and recognizable breeds of dog.

The 'human race' is a phrase that doesn't make that much sense. If there is only one race, then the word race doesn't apply and it's the human species. If you want to say, there is only the one human species, then fine. Otherwise it's just dumb... 'human race' compared to what other race of humans? Neanderthals or something?
10 years ago
Just because the term human 'race' is used doesn't mean anything. Different breeds of dogs are all merely subspecies of wolf, but they are seperated by clear rules. So, are you going to have pure breed subspecies of humans and mix breeds (mutts), hahahahah? Good luck trying to get that boneheaded idea to fly and again, I'll ask you, by what criteria would you seperate humans, and how many different groups would there be, etc...?

You can't do it. You can't bilogically justify you own precious idea. It's just intellectual conceit.
10 years ago
Sure dog breeds are separated by clear rules. You can buy purebred dogs that come with a piece of paper saying all their great, great-granddaddies were the same breed and the same as their great, g great, grandmothers. Same shit happens with humans. Most cultures discourage interracial couples, so we can point to a lot of white and black and oriental people and show that they're as purebred as any dog. And the races are easily visually distinguished.

You don't need to know how many breeds of dog there are to know that there are breeds of dog. I'm sure there's a shitload of different groups of humans that are clearly distinguishable from each other. Hell, I can't tell some breeds of dogs apart but it's pretty obvious when you see a german dude standing next to a chinese dude that they weren't case from the same mold. It doesn't matter. What matters is that there are obviously different breeds of dogs, and they are different.

Just like the dogs, the different races in humans are characterized with different appearances, different strenghts and weaknesses, and they'll even be more likely to face different health problems.

And I'm not trying to get any idea to fly. I'm not making a value judgment here, especially since I'm probably getting married to a beautiful brown Indian girl and will have little mutt kids. I'm just saying that there are different races of human on the planet and there are differences between them. You could argue that the genes that give the races different looks have no other effects, but the looks themselves will result in different lives and you will still find that the there are significant differences between the races.

And if you're pushing and fighting for something in the world, you take every advantage you can. You play the odds. If you gotta pick a basketball team at a moment's notice, you pick the black guys. Just like if you gotta pick a guard dog, you take the german shephard over the fucking poodle.

Every question you got about dividing up humans applies to every other species that gets divided up, and we still do it with them.
10 years ago
Holy shit that's long. I shouldn't write when I'm loaded.
10 years ago
you still haven't answered hank's question.
10 years ago
No, he hasn't.

He can't answer them.

By what criteria would you seperate humans into different groups and how many different groups would there be, etc.. Also, if you use other animals than dogs, his analogy doesn't work.

Dogs are varieties of wolf. Different types of humans are varieties of Homo sapien. One species. Sub species of of other animals (not humans, or domesticated animals) interbreed very rarely and thus are not a useful comparison to humans.
10 years ago
Hank just because you knocked up an asian chick doesn't mean humans interbreed frequently. In the melting pot US, less than 3 percent of marriages are interracial couples and less than 3 percent of births are to interracial couples. (According to census data from the gov, not wiki.) Chinese data shows 0.7 of couples being interracial. And 10 years ago these numbers were a even smaller. We can classify people into races pretty easily because they do rarely interbreed. It's been only a few generations now since some people first saw other people they hadn't been exposed to for centuries.

Either way, I don't know what you want here. Apparently there are 67 subspecies of deer mice, though I'm sure I couldn't tell them all apart and even if I could I wouldn't be able to determine that 67 number myself since I'm not about to travel around looking everywhere for distinct new types of deer mice. I'm not going to travel the world looking for distinct groups of humans either, for the sake of counting how many there are. But just because I can't do it easily doesn't mean there are no subspecies of deer mice. You keep asking how exactly to separate them, as if the ability to do so defines the existence of race or doesn't.

Again, can you tell me how many colors there are and classify every mixing of light and pigment in the world as one of them? If not, then I guess colors don't exist, and I don't see how you can really say that your teeth are a different color than your shit.

And if someone did go around and collect a bunch of these deer mice from different places, and let them all breed in a mouse orgy and produce a shitload of little mixed mice, would that mean that there are no longer subpecies of deer mice? Would the guy doing it be able to declare, "there is only one race, the deer-mouse race"?

Plus that whole "there's only the one human race" thing is still fucking stupid. The statement can only be false or vacuously true. It's meaningless jibber jabber that pisses off Mr. T.
10 years ago
i hate deer mice too
10 years ago
I have to say Hank, I think I agree with Wanko on this one. It makes sense to me, if you look at humans like you would any other species on the planet. And if you get rid of the word "race" altogether and just use subspecies, since they're exactly the same thing, people just don't like using the same terminology for humans as we do for animals, then I don't see how it would any different dividing humans into subspecies as it would be dividing any other species of animal. You ask us to do it, to show how it would be done, but I for one can't do that, because I'm not a biologist. Same as how I have no idea how a biologist distinguishes between the 67 different subspecies of deer mice. They all damn alike to me. But somehow, they do it, based primarily on physical characteristics I would imagine. I'm sure then that somehow they could do it with humans too.
10 years ago
They all look*
10 years ago
Oh, that crazy Bichaus....
Shouldn't he be off blowing a boat-load of herpes-ridden sailors?
10 years ago
by day, yes.



but by night...
10 years ago
El chapulin colorado!
10 years ago
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/El_Chapul%C3%ADn_Colorado
10 years ago
aka chesperito
10 years ago
el chavo del ocho
10 years ago
Don Ramon
10 years ago
latin-american invasion on mucho! and i thought that scandinavian invasion was bad..
10 years ago
man, I hate that show. this costume is VERY famous here in brazil because of some mexican show. Here we call the guy "chapolin colorado".

its supposed to be a classic.

I hate it.
10 years ago
Chapulin Colorado.
10 years ago
Well done vagabundo, you're only about 14 hours too late with that one.
10 years ago
i didnt even bother to look if someone already posted it :3
10 years ago
what does a nigger lover know about El chapulin colorado!
10 years ago
Ask your mama.
10 years ago
You fucking tool.
10 years ago
i like his mallet.
10 years ago
But he looks nothing like Harry Potter...
10 years ago
recover password
most discussed

below are mucho's most discussed submissions of the last 12 hours. join in on the discussion!