points: 1

owned

this is for you broccoli

featured

by DetectiveRonnn

submitted August 16th 2007

0 comments
what do you think? let everyone know!
tagged:
votes:
muchoworthytr_willk
not muchoworthy
comments (0)
Headless corpses are usually the best.
10 years ago
Never gonna get AHEAD in life driving that way.
10 years ago
Or on Mucho with that stupid shit.
10 years ago
If only he would have used his head while driving.
10 years ago
you see if you fuck a dead persons mouth the mouth gets dry or you use lots of lube thut is better used in other places....if you remove the head you dont have to worry about that problem..
10 years ago
nope that black gangsta crip midget was driving he survived.
10 years ago
Some asshole probably put the cones so he would drive on that side.
10 years ago
Uhhhhhh....
*hides behind wreckage*
10 years ago
You're fapping to that?
10 years ago
Rape of the dead to be precise.
10 years ago
some of these videos won't workkkk! :(
10 years ago
I've been having that problem for the last couple nights, then they work the next day.
10 years ago
This one still won't fucking work. YAK!
10 years ago
I want my money back!
10 years ago
Red Asphalt??
10 years ago
I don't know how much that Dozer weighs, but it would take some serious force to move it like that.
10 years ago
You are right....I feel more badly for the chap in the dozer....
10 years ago
I'd tell you, but my old physics text book is kinda buried right now.
10 years ago
Fuck it, I'll just derive them again.
10 years ago
Taking a guess that the car weighs 3300 lbs, loaded (1500 kg), moved 13 feet (about 4 meters, the approximate length of the car), in probably 1/2 a second (the video is in slow motion)... Gives me 48000 Newtons, or approximately 10800 foot-pounds of force.
10 years ago
That acceleration at about 3.5 g's.
10 years ago
*that's
10 years ago
So , you're saying that the weight of the car on impact, created just over 100,000 pounds of force. That seems to be just barely enough to move a dozer. But again, the dozer barely moved, so you are most likely correct.
And by the looks of the video, only the front half was moved....
10 years ago
smerf that's some excrutiating detail there.
10 years ago
yes i made a spelling error
10 years ago
I was basing my calculations on assumptions and guesswork. I stated my assumptions and based my work on the equation dX = Vo*t + 1/2*a*t^2. I actually worked it as if the car had started at zero, got hit by the spinning dozer and was put to the speed it was at the start of the video.
10 years ago
o...uh... my mistake
10 years ago
that car sure hit that bulldozer pretty fuckin hard.
10 years ago
C'mon smerf! Basic physics here! a NEGATIVE acceleration with proper nomenclature is (-)3.5g, right? -9.8m/s/s
10 years ago
Depends on what the original velocity is. If the original V was negative, than a is positive.
10 years ago
Plus, I only gave the magnitude of the acceleration, not the direction.
10 years ago
Damn..lol
10 years ago
I bet 20 that was a female.
10 years ago
*sigh* Females
10 years ago
im fairly sure this is a crash test video
10 years ago
welp thats one way to get a buzz cut...
10 years ago
his HEADlights are not working
10 years ago
Bah. In Vanishing Point they crash a Camaro head-on into two bulldozers.
10 years ago
That was one of the most disappointing endings ever.
10 years ago
Maybe it could have been done better but the whole film was set up to finish that way.

I heard they are going to fuck it all up with yet another remake to showcase the new Dodge Challenger.
10 years ago
Fuckers. They can't remake car chase movies. It will end up like "Bored in 60 Seconds."
10 years ago
Kinda looks like a "what-if" scenario...
10 years ago
recover password
most discussed

below are mucho's most discussed submissions of the last 12 hours. join in on the discussion!